Quicksandslowly sent me his submission for a
free SAT practice essay critique.
My method:
1. Post the essay as it was originally sent to me.
2. Give my comments line-by-line, with a focus on grammar.
3. Post my re-write, fixing grammatical errors only.
4. Provide general feedback, with a focus on structure.
5. Score the original essay from 1-6, using the SAT rubric.
Original EssayThe prompt for this essay is: "No progress is possible without sacrifice."
The world is spate with obstacles. In order to overcome these adversities and make progress, we must sacrifice some things. The process is tedious, histronic, and even gloomy but progress wouldn't be possible without it. This notion is seen throughout literature and history.
One instance of the human necessity to sacrifice things, even people, in order to achieve fluidity can be seen in John Steinbecks novel, "The Grapes of Wrath." Driven off their land and left without jobs, the Joad family sell their valuable possessions and leave their farm for California to find jobs. Along the way, both Grandma and Grandpa Joad pass away; however, because the competition to find jobs in California is tough, the Joad family has to leave them without a proper funeral ceremony and move on. This sacrifice enabled the living to progress while the dead rests in peace.
Another instance of no progress without sacrifice is epitomized in the historic event of the Battle of Normandy during World War 2. On D-Day, thousands of brave U.S. soldiers marched to their deaths at Normandy. Despite seeing fellow comrades die, other soldiers kept charging and fighting to their deaths. Their sacrifice and valor resulted in the defeat of the maniac Hilter and the Axis Powers.
Shifting in time in history to biblical times, Jesus Christ is the paragon of sacrifice for progress. In order to cleanse the sins of humanity, Jesus Christ allowed himself to be crucified. Jesus Christ sacrificied himself so that humanity may prosper.
Progress comes at a price and the most painful of all is sacrifice. As the examples of literature, history, and religion have shown, without sacrifice their is no progress. Thus, without sacrifice the world would be stagnant.
Line-by-Line CommentsNow for a detailed analysis....
The world is spate with obstacles.
The word
spate is not used correctly.
Spate is
noun meaning "flood" or "outpouring." You are using it as an
adjective.
Also, the phrase
spate with is not a correct formulation. The idiom is
a spate of, as in "She smiled, through a spate of tears."
A better word for this sentence is
replete: "The world is replete with obstacles."
Or
rife: "The world is rife with obstacles."
Or
full: "The world is full of obstacles."
On the SAT essay, it's best to stick with words you know, especially in the first sentence. First impressions count. SAT graders scan and score quickly, but they are certain to pay special attention to your first sentence. You need to get this one right.
A rich vocabulary can improve your score, but misusing words could lower it.
In order to overcome these adversities and make progress, we must sacrifice some things.
This is good.
You could improve this sentence by changing
sacrifice some things to
make sacrifices.
It is best to
end your sentences on your strongest word, the word that makes your point. Here, that word is
sacrifice. The sentence should land on this word, this idea, rather than on the much more nebulous word
things.
The process is tedious, histronic, and even gloomy but progress wouldn't be possible without it.
What do you mean by
histronic? That's not a word.Did you mean
historic? Or
histrionic? Neither one works here.
My suggestion is simply to cut it: "The process is tedious, even gloomy, but..."
Put a comma after
gloomy.
This notion is seen throughout literature and history.
Good.
One instance of the human necessity to sacrifice things, even people, in order to achieve fluidity can be seen in John Steinbecks novel, "The Grapes of Wrath."
I'm not sure what you mean by
achieve fluidity. Make progress?
Fluidity sounds like a counterpoint to the idea of
stagnation, which you mention later, but at this point you haven't yet raised the issue of stagnation. So the use of
fluidity here seems like a non sequitur.
Add an apostrophe:
John Steinbeck's.
Driven off their land and left without jobs, the Joad family sell their valuable possessions and leave their farm for California to find jobs.
Change
sell to
sells. Families
sell, but a family
sells.
Change
leave to
leaves. Families
leave, but a family
leaves.
Always make sure your
subjects and verbs agree in number.
Along the way, both Grandma and Grandpa Joad pass away; however, because the competition to find jobs in California is tough, the Joad family has to leave them without a proper funeral ceremony and move on.
Good use of the semicolon.
This is a complex sentence, but you handled it well under time pressure.
Good job.
This sacrifice enabled the living to progress while the dead rests in peace.
Change
rests to
rest. A dead person
rests, but the dead
rest.
Another instance of no progress without sacrifice is epitomized in the historic event of the Battle of Normandy during World War 2.
Delete
epitomized in: "Another instance…is the historic event.…"
On D-Day, thousands of brave U.S. soldiers marched to their deaths at Normandy.
Good.
Despite seeing fellow comrades die, other soldiers kept charging and fighting to their deaths.
Good.
Their sacrifice and valor resulted in the defeat of the maniac Hilter and the Axis Powers.
Change
sacrifice and valor to
valor and sacrifice.
Why? Because you should put first things first. Their
sacrifice is the ultimate sacrifice (death). It came
after their
valor, which they demonstrated when alive.
So put
valor first, and
sacrifice second.
Also, this could be interpreted as an example of
cause and
effect.
The cause?
Valor.
The effect?
Sacrifice.
For clarity, you should state the cause
before the effect.
Suggestion: change
maniac to
maniacal. You need an
adjective.
Maniac can function as an adjective, too, but I think
maniacal sounds better.
Or you could say, "...that maniac, Hitler, and the Axis Powers."
Typo: change
Hilter to
Hitler.
Shifting in time in history to biblical times, Jesus Christ is the paragon of sacrifice for progress.
Delete
in time in history and capitalize
biblical: "Shifting to Biblical times…"
This is a
dangling participle. Is it Jesus Christ who is doing the shifting? No.
One possible way to fix this: "Another example, from Biblical times, is Jesus Christ, the paragon of sacrifice for progress."
In order to cleanse the sins of humanity, Jesus Christ allowed himself to be crucified.
Do you cleanse the sins of humanity, or do you cleanse humanity of its sins?
Humanity gets
cleansed. Sins get
washed away.
Jesus Christ sacrificied himself so that humanity may prosper.
Typo: change
sacrificied to
sacrificed.
Change
may to
could. It was not a question of permission, but possibility.
Progress comes at a price and the most painful of all is sacrifice.
Put a comma after
price.
You may want clarify
sacrifice in this sentence, since there are some minor sacrifices that would not be "the most painful of all."
As the examples of literature, history, and religion have shown, without sacrifice their is no progress.
Change
the examples of to
these examples from.
Change
have shown to
show.
Change
their to
there.
Thus, without sacrifice the world would be stagnant.
Good. Nice ending.
In
Part Two of this free essay critique, I'll offer a rewrite, structural feedback, and a score from 1 to 6.
Thoughts? Suggestions? Please comment below.
How to Succeed with SAT Test Preparation